YOUSSEF CHAHINE PASSES AWAY


The grand master of Arab cinema, Egyptian film director Youssef Chahine, died at the age of 82 in Cairo on Sunday July 27 th after an often controversial career which spanned half a century. For a man already in his 80s and who was credited with introducing art-house movies to the Arab world, his last work „Chaos” (released last year with the Arabic title of Heya Fawda) pulled no punches.

„He skewers political parties and Islamists,” was the verdict of the film industry’s Variety magazine.”He levels devastating charges against the past half-century of autocratic rule, whose regimes have destroyed civil society and made the average citizen either apathetic or afraid to protest.”

Chahine was airlifted to hospital in Paris after suffering a brain hemorrhage and falling into a coma on June 14, with the Egyptian state footing the bill. He was returned to Egypt still comatose on July 16.

„I am young. I am only 81 years old,” Chahine told a press conference at the Venice Film Festival last September. „I hope I can keep working for another 10 years. Old age is to let oneself become old.”

Chahine won official plaudits for his pioneering role in Egypt’s film industry and was awarded the Cannes festival’s 50th anniversary lifetime achievement award in 1997. But he has never shied away from controversy, criticizing US foreign policy as well as Egypt and the Arab world.

Chahine made his first of 44 movies in 1950 and it was he who discovered and launched the career of fellow Egyptian Omar Sharif, who then shot to stardom with „Lawrence of Arabia” and „Doctor Zhivago.”A Variety reviewer hailed Destiny as „the most courageous frontal attack on Islamic fundamentalism to come out of the Arab cinema to date … and a blunt allegory condemning the politically driven fanaticism of present times.” Despite his often abrasive tone, Egyptian authorities – officially at least – recognized Chahine’s contribution to the nation’s cinema and his „daring” representation of its society. Chahine is survived by his French wife Colette. A funeral ceremony will be held in Cairo on Monday, ahead of his burial in Alexandria.

YOUSSEF CHAHINE, director of some 40 films, is probably the most independent of Arab film-makers, producing what he thinks is important, even at his own expense, and raising issues that disturb.

Born in 1926, son of a Syrian lawyer and a Christian family in Alexandria, Egypt, Chahine attended the prestigious Victoria College. He dreamed of the cinema and theatre, watched Hollywood musicals, and in 1946 left to study drama in California. Chahine’s early films in Egypt included Raging Sky (1953), begun while Farouk was still King and dealing with a peasant farmer’s challenge to a feudal landlord. But the first truly indicative film of his style and preoccupations was Cairo Central Station (Bab al-Hadid), in 1958.

Chahine himself plays the central character, Kenaoui, a simple-minded man, beneficently employed as a newspaper-seller. He cuts pictures of women from magazines for the station hut he lives in, but a living focus of his sexual frustrations is Hanouma (played by the popular actress Hind Rostom), who sells lemonade and is engaged to Abou Serib (Farid Chawqi), porter and trade union organiser. With unthinking but affectionate playfulness Hanouma exacerbates Kenaoui’s frustration and adds to his confusion which leads to tragic death. Egyptian audiences, used to simpler melodramas, were disturbed and rejected the film. It was not seen again for some 20 years.

In 1963 Chahine made Saladin (original title: El Nasser – defender/deliverer – Salah ed-Dine), an epic, three-hour film in CinemaScope named after the 12th Century Sultan who, as the film begins, is preparing to liberate Jerusalem from its Christian Crusader occupiers. It was scripted by Naguib Mahfouz and the poet and progressive writer, Abderrahman Cherkaoui, and a parallel between Saladin and President Nasser is easily drawn. Saladin is shown as an educated and peaceable man – at one point he is asked to give clandestine medical help to Richard (the Lion Heart), shot by an arrow, and later he tells him: „Religion is God’s and the Earth is for all … I guarantee to all Christians in Jerusalem the same rights as are enjoyed by Muslims.”

A novel by Cherkaoui, serialised in 1952, formed the basis of The Earth (1968), noted particularly for its image of the peasant farmer – „eternal ‘damned of the earth’” – which broke with „the ridiculous image the cinema had (hitherto) given him” (Khaled Osman). There followed a further collaboration with Mahfouz on The Choice (1970), ostensibly a murder investigation story involving twin brothers, but with the underlying theme of intellectual schizophrenia. In 1976 he made The Return Of The Prodigal Son, a „musical tragedy”, but four years earlier had made one of his greatest films, The Sparrow (1972), both co-productions with Algeria. A journalist and a young police officer meet while investigating incidents of corruption. They and other people of the left pass through Bahiyya’s house, whose name represents the idea of the mother country and is invoked in Cheikh Imam’s song at the end of the film. After Nasser’s announcement of the defeat in the war and his subsequent resignation, Bahiyya runs into the street, followed by a growing crowd, shouting „No! we must fight. We won’t accept defeat!”

In Alexandria, Why? (1978), Yehia, a young Victoria College student, is obsessed with Hollywod and dreams of making cinema. It is 1942, the Germans are about to enter Alexandria, thought preferable to the presence of the British. Yehia’s cousin is gay and ‘buys’ drunken British soldiers. Jewish friends are forced to leave and decide to settle in Palestine. In An Egyptian Story (1982) Yehia is a flim-maker, going to London (as Chahine had earlier) for open-heart surgery. He has a brief affair with a taxi driver. As a result of the operation, he reviews his life: moments of Chahine’s own films are replayed against their autobiographical and social historical context. Memory is very important to Chahine’s most recent work —whether of the „city of my childhood, Alexandria, between the two world wars tolerant, secular, open to Muslims, Christians and Jews” or of a more distant past: such as evoked in Adieu Bonaparte (1985), based on the cultural aspect of Bonaparte’s expedition into Egypt (1798). „Out of this marvellous confrontation there was a rebirth of Egyptian consciousness, of its past … which belongs to humanity.”

See also:

The early years of Arab cinema

The new Arab cinema

http://www.joussefchahine.us

Eu, la feminin (6)


A zecea muză, Sapho

O femeie care a traversat istoria prin fragmente de papirus, cioburi de amfore şi a intrat în eternitate cu versurile ei de o sinceritate inimitabile. La 300 de ani după moartea ei, erudiţii din Alexandria deshumau din colbul uitării o poetă de geniu. Şi se scandalizau. Nu din cauza poeziei, ci din pricina femeii care a scris-o. Aveau toate motivele. O femeie care iubeşte o altă femeie, se întâmplă. Dar o femeie care iubeşte alte zece, douăzeci sau chiar o sută de femei, e ceva inadmisibil. E indecent. E imoral. E condamnabil…

Incendiara Sapho, ca orice geniu, avea temperament. În plus, se născuse pe o insulă care a tulburat întotdeauna imaginaţia grecilor, inclusiv pe a bătrânului Homer: Lesbos. Cu 2500 de ani în urmă, femeile acestei insule din vecinătatea Asiei Mici, erau vestite pentru frumuseţea lor, uşor exotică. Mai mult decât frumoase, erau talentate în muzică şi poezie, la fel ca în dragoste. Adevărate hetaire. Pe aceste preotese ale Afroditei le va smulge Sapho – care era micuţă şi nu tocmai frumoasă – din braţele seducătorilor bărbaţi. Motiv de îngrijorare în Agora! Lui Sapho însă, puţin îi pasă. Sapho e bogată. În drahme, talent şi îndrăzneală. O rebelă.

Născută într-o familie de nobili mytileni, la 15 ani e măritată cu un negustor bogat care are bunul simţ să moară repede, lăsându-i văduvei de numai 20 de ani o fiică, o avere consistentă şi libertatea de care avea nevoie. Uşa coliviei odată deschisă, pasărea îşi poate lua zborul cântând şi iubind după placul ei. Căci Sapho are norocul să-şi trăiască tinereţea într-o „paranteză liberală”. Familia ei tocmai câştigase bătălia politică pentru instalarea la Mytilene a unui tiran binevoitor. Convinsă deci că nu are motive de îngrijorare, Sapho îşi acordează lira şi se dedică trup şi suflet muzicii şi poeziei. Compune cântece şi scrie epitalamuri, elegii şi imnuri, pe cât de frumoase, pe atât de îndrăzneţe, pe care le dedică nenumăratelor ei iubite. Caz fără precedent, Sapho cântă la fel de bine şi în faţa publicului masculin, literalmente ameţit de senzualitatea poemelor şi farmecul inteligent al poetei. Faima ei şi a şcolii ei de poezie ajunge şi la Atena. „A zecea muză”, cum era numită, face ravagii în rândul intelighenţiei de pe continent cu inovaţiile sale prozodice (strofa safică şi versul safic). O curte de poeţi şi de admiratori se înghesuie în jurul ei, dar Sapho îi respinge rând pe rând pe cei care aspiră la mâna şi inima ei. Pentru ea, bărbaţii, „ape învolburate” rămân un potenţial pericol, capabili să-i răpească sufletul odată cu trupul. La fel şi pe al iubitelor sale. Perfect amorală, pătimaşă, neliniştită, maniaco-depresivă, Sapho iubeşte şi tremură mereu de gelozie. Visează, tânjeşte după Marea Iubire, unica, adevărata, desăvârşita, care nu mai vine…

La 30 de ani, în culmea celebrităţii şi gloriei literare, Sapho este condamnată la exil. Un nou tiran – tiran de-adevăratele – „normalizează” Lesbosul. Alungată pentru imoralitate, poeta se retrage la Siracuza, în Sicilia. Îi este teamă. O teamă care sălăşluise în ea dintotdeauna pentru că, în idilicul Lesbos, ca de altfel în întreaga Elada, a te naşte femeie echivala cu infernul. În lumea greacă a epocii clasice, situaţia femeii nu era deloc demnă de prestigiul unei democraţii poleite cu aur. Într-o familie în care se năşteau mai mult de două fete, mezinele erau sortite morţii, părăsite într-un loc pustiu, abandonate frigului şi inaniţiei. Un „control al naşterilor” cu nimic mai moral decât moralitatea poetei. Sapho a fost norocoasă. A fost prima născută în familie şi după ea au urmat doi băieţi. Ştia că îşi datorează viaţa hazardului.

Traumatizată de oribilul destin împlinit de nenumăratele ei surori anonime, cu siguranţă că Sapho şi-a iubit semenele revoltându-se. Şi a plătit pentru nesupunerea ei. Până şi moartea i-a fost deturnată, mistificată. Trei secole după dispariţia ei, un autor atenian îi consacra o piesă de teatru. O Sapho devenită legendă se sinucidea din cauza unei iubiri neîmpărtăşite pentru un tânăr şi frumos barcagiu, Phaon. Răbufnire sulfuroasă a inconştientului colectiv masculin, mândru că a reuşit, în fine să inventeze o Sapho femelă, supusă, îmblânzită, învinsă…

Oricum, în Lesbos ordinea fusese deja, cu mult timp înainte restaurată. Insula iubirii se prăbuşise sub sabia implacabilei Atena. Într-un discurs plin de muşchi, democraticul Pericle le reamintea tuturor grecoaicelor limitele libertăţilor femeieşti: „ să trăiască şi să moară îndeplinindu-şi îndatoririle familiale, fără a fi văzute sau cunoscute în afara căminului lor”. În mod paradoxal, spaţiul deschis al Agorei era „închis” pentru femei. Adio revoltă, adio Sapho!

The Melbourne International Film Festival


The Melbourne International Film Festival, or MIFF, has been running since 1951. The 57th MIFF was held from 25 July–10 August 2008. The festival showcases a diverse array of films from across the world.

Known as Australia’s most critically acclaimed film festival, MIFF has enjoyed a period of rapid expansion over the past ten years, increasing its audience size by 230% since 1996. The festival also boasts a rich history, celebrating 57 years in 2008, making it one of the oldest film festivals in the world. The festival now enjoys annual admissions of 170,000 – 180,000, making it both a significant and iconic public event for Melbourne and the largest film festival (with respect to programme and audience size) in Australia.

In addition to screening films from around fifty countries, MIFF is Australia’s largest showcase of new Australian cinema and most vocal champion of both emerging and established local film making talent.

MIFF Dates

Friday 25 July – Opening Night Hamer Hall.

Saturday 26 July – Zombie gathering at RMIT Capitol Theatre 8.30pm to see George Romero and the Australian Premiere of Diary of the Dead.

Sunday 27 July – Rock n Roll Nerd World Premiere at RMIT Capitol Theatre at 5pm. Director Rhian Skirving in attendance.

Sunday 27 July – In Conversation with George A. Romero at the Coopers Festival Lounge at 7pm.

Monday 28 July – Geoffrey Rush presents The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith at the Forum with a Q&A with Geoffrey Rush and Fred Schepisi.

Wednesday 30 July – Charity screening of Young @ Heart at the Rooftop Cinema for Melbourne Citymission. Doors open 6pm.

Wednesday 30 July – MIFF launches the new Backbeat program with an After Party at the Coopers Festival Lounge at 9pm.

Saturday 2 August – Q&A with Temuera Morrison at the Forum at 2.45pm following the screening of Rain of the Children.

Saturday 2 August – In Conversation with Morgan Spurlock at the coopers Festival Lounge at 4pm hosted by John Safran.

Tuesday 5 August – Eric Bana presents Mad Max II at the Forum at 7pm with a Q&A with Eric following the screening.

Related Sessions
12:08 EAST OF BUCHAREST
Tue 5 Aug 08 9:15 PM

Session Description
‘It’s a movie that seems simple, yet its subtle and brilliant complexity is not to be denied.’ – San Francisco Chronicle

With its title referring to the exact time dictator Nicolae Ceausescu fled Romania’s presidential palace on 22 December 1989, 12.08 East of Bucharest cleverly looks, with a sly wink, at the aftermath of a revolution – most notably the skewed recollection of events by different people.
On the eve of the revolution’s anniversary a second-rate television talk show host recruits two average Romanians to debate the topic of the night: did the revolution happen in their town, or not?
Winner of the Camxra d’Or at Cannes 2006, Corneliu Porumboiu’s debut feature is a comedic, razor-sharp critique of the nature of memory and accepted histories.

D/P/S Corneliu Porumboiu WS Coproduction Office
L Romanian w/English subtitles TD 35mm/2006/89mins

New Romanian Cinema at Melbourne

Monday, October 22, 2007 On Saturday, veteran film journalist Nick Roddick led a provocative discussion on the sudden emergence of film gems from what had seemed like a most unlikely source: Romania. 4 MONTHS, 3 WEEKS, 2 DAYS (which is screening at the London Film Festival) was the surprise winner of the Palme d’Or at this year’s Cannes Film Festival (a first from the cinema of that rather unknown and misunderstood country). Attention is definitely focused on the former Communist state as a new hotbed for the hottest talents working in international cinema.

The panelists included Cristian Mungiu, the acclaimed director of 4 MONTHS, 3 WEEKS, 2 DAYS; Andrei Boncea, producer of CALIFORNIA DREAMIN’, which screens at the Festival; Adina Bradeanu, Romanian film journalist; and Ada Solomon, film producer and Executive Director of NexT Cultural Society & NexT Film Festival in Bucharet. The panel discussed the success of such breakout films as the critical favorites THE DEATH OF MR. LAZARESCU (directed by Cristi Puiu) and 12:08 EAST OF BUCHAREST (Corneliu Porumboiu), which singlehandedly put contemporary Romanian cinema on the map. Now with the high profile of Mungiu’s film, Romania has become the new „it” country on the world stage of cinema.


Panelists discussed why they felt the Romanian cinema was suddenly hot, while also questioning if there is truly a „national cinema” in place to take advantage of all the acclaim and attention. Some speakers felt that this sudden focus is nothing more than fate….the unlikely convergence of a number of buzz-worthy films made within a short span of time, which just happen to share a national origin. Others felt that the drama of recent Romanian history with the deposing of the autocrat Ceausescu and his wife by firing squad and the explosion of artistic freedom has made the country an incubator for new trends and ideas. Wherever the truth may lie, the fact is that Romanian cinema is having its moment and could generate the newest of the New Waves, as Mexico, Brazil, Argentina and South Korea have done in recent years. The best way to sample the new Romanian cinema is to catch both 4 MONTHS, 3 WEEKS, 2 DAYS and CALIFORNIA DREAMIN’ during their runs at the London Film Festival. Then, you can decide if this is a passing fad, or the start of a noble cinema tradition.

Sandy Mandelberger, London FF Dailies Editor

Rencontre photographiques d’Arles 2008


Rencontre photographiques d’Arles 2008 : sous le signe de la mode.

Tous les deux ans, les Rencontres d’Arles invitent un directeur artistique singulier qui vient apposer sa marque sur le festival. La surprise cette année fut de retrouver un grand couturier à cet endroit : Christian Lacroix. La diversité des regards qu’il a sélectionnés pour participer à cette édition témoigne de son ouverture et de sa passion pour l’image fixe.


Au final ce sont 20 photographes qui ont été invités à prendre place dans les différents lieux d’exposition d’Arles. Vous pourrez également pendant l’été retrouver des documents photographiques et des archives sur la Maison Lacroix ainsi que la mode en général. Seront également à découvrir des jeunes talents prétendants aux prix des rencontres d’Arles.
Autour du festival, vous pourrez assister à des événements, des stages et des ateliers, des soirées, projections et autres présentation de portfolios. Bref, tout ce qui fait d’Arles une des capitales photographique mondiale, chaque été.

Expositions du 8 juillet au 14 septembre 2008
Informations pratiques sur le site www.rencontres-arles.com

Eu, la feminin (5)


Să îmbătrânim frumoase!

Cine n-ar vrea? În pofida tuturor evidenţelor, căci bătrâneţea nu e frumoasă. Deloc. Nu trebuie decât să priveşti în jur.

În fond, amânarea morţii e problema noastră a tuturor. Atâta doar că este cam greu să trăieşti un secol când, după patruzeci de ani nu mai ai nici o căutare. Ca să nu mai vorbim de femeile care au prostul obicei de a trăi în medie cu 7,8 ani mai mult decât bărbaţii şi pentru care, greutatea vârstei împreună cu dictatura eternei tinereţi formează un cockteil de-a dreptul exploziv. Subînţelesurile culturale sunt şi ele asurzitoare. „O femeie îngrijită ţine la drum mult şi bine!”. Ca o maşină. Doar să vrea. „Fiecare Maud îşi găseşte Harold-ul ei!” Cu condiţia să fie docilă şi la dispoziţia producătorilor de cosmetice sau a chirurgiei estetice. „O femeie de 50 de ani valorează cât două de 25!” În banii cheltuiţi prin saloanele de frumuseţe, probabil. Mass media repetă până la epuizare: ţineţi regim, zâmbiţi, râdeţi, rămâneţi tinere… în timp ce-ţi arată imaginea unei anorexice de 18 ani! A renunţa, înseamnă a dezerta. Trebuie să fii femeie, a se înţelege feminină, să seduci chiar dacă ai ajuns în scaunul cu rotile. Dacă se poate, şi dincolo de el. Să fim serioşi. Promisiuni trucate ale tinereţii fără bătrâneţe. Basme. Adevărat, nevasta unui senator se conservă (ce cuvânt!) pentru mai mult timp şi mai bine decât o muncitoare dintr-o fabrică de mobilă, spre o pildă. Dar cu ce preţ? Şi pentru ce de fapt?

Femeile s-au obişnuit să se iubească prin ochii celor care le privesc şi nu se mai plac aşa cum sunt. Trist şi adevărat. Totul se bazează pe narcisism şi seducţie, iar crema antirid întreţine iluzia. Creează dependenţă. O femeie care nu mai e seducătoare, e ca un bărbat impotent. Recte, nimic. O negare a umanului.

Prin urmare…


…femeile au cu îmbătrânirea o relaţie specială. Longevitatea nu e neapărat o binefacere. Deficienţe fizice şi mentale, anemie, osteoporoză, depresii – sunt „bolile” mai mult sau mai puţin „sexuale” legate de ceea ce a devenit condiţia fiziologică şi afectivă a femeii în societatea noastră. Iar exigenţele modernităţii tind să facă din această ineluctabilă aventură, o tragedie. Pentru că femeile trăiesc mai mult decât bărbaţii, şi pentru că bărbaţii – privilegiu suspect – se căsătoresc cu femei mai tinere decât ei, văduvele sunt câtă frunză şi iarbă. Trei sferturi dintre bărbaţii de 65 de ani sau peste, sunt căsătoriţi, în timp ce la aceeaşi vârstă, mai mult de jumătate din populaţia feminină este văduvă. Aşadar, văduvia este destinul femeii! Corolarul singurătăţii şi vulnerabilităţii sociale, dixit sociologii şi psihologii, la unison. Cu excepţiile care întăresc regula. Excepţii care nu mai perpetuează specia şi se numesc Theacher, Albright…

Întâi constaţi că bărbaţii nu mai întorc capul după tine pe stradă. Apoi, că instalatorul nu-ţi mai face curte şi te taxează mai mult ca de obicei. La început te miri, pe urmă te simţi fantastic, te simţi liberă! Nu mai trebuie să fii preocupată să atragi atenţia, să mergi la coafor, să te simţi nenorocită că bărbaţii nu-ţi caută privirile. Foarte curând însă, se instalează panica. Descoperi că nu e vorba de ceva trecător, de o pauză binevenită, ci de o transformare lungă şi inexorabilă. Devii bănuitoare când soţul tău întârzie în conversaţii amabile cu vecina de la trei, o femeie mult prea tânără. Părerea ta. Drept răzbunare, a doua zi îţi cumperi o nouă cremă hidratantă. Cea mai scumpă din magazin. Ţii cură de slăbire ca să încapi în bikini-ul de acum zece ani. Serile te plimbi pe situ-rile porno şi adormi cu gândul la cel mai sexy bărbat pe care l-ai cunoscut, cu 30 de ani în urmă… Dimineţile te priveşti în oglindă tot mai mult şi tot mai speriată, tot mai deprimată. Obsedată. Într-o bună zi, copii tăi te privesc şi ei. Critic. „Mamă, asta nu eşti tu!” Au dreptate, nu eşti. Părul tău e roşu-morcoviu (a treia nuanţă în decurs de o lună), iar hainele i se potrivesc mai bine fiicei tale decât ţie. Semeni cu imitaţia nereuşită a lui Cher. O mască. Jalnică.

Şi totuşi, cum ar trebui să fii? Ai mintea şi sufletul la fel de tinere ca la 30 de ani, dar nu e suficient. Nu te mulţumesc jumătăţile de măsură, limitele impuse… Dar nu ai nici curajul să le încalci. Accepţi resemnarea? Nu eşti foarte hotărâtă, chiar dacă în fine, ai înţeles că bătălia pe care trebuie să o dai nu e pentru o imagine, ci împotriva tendinţei de izolare care te pândeşte, împotriva renunţării şi pasivităţii, împotriva ideii de deşeu biologic… Dacă mai poţi, te consolezi, patetic, cu gândul că oricum, la 80, 90 de ani, când în sfârşit natura nivelează cultura, bărbaţii foarte bătrâni şi femeile foarte bătrâne seamănă între ei. Se termină discriminarea…

Magdalena Vaida

GEORGIA O’KEEFFE – The Art of Identity


I get out my work and have a show for myself before I have it publicly. I make up my own mind about it–how good or bad or indifferent it is. After that the critics can write what they please. I have already settled it for myself so flattery and criticism go down the same drain and I am quite free.

Georgia O’Keeffe

She was among the pioneers of modernism in America. Georgia O’Keeffe was part of the Steglitz circle and went on to marry him in 1924. She is chiefly known for paintings in which she synthesized abstraction and representation in paintings of flowers, rocks, shells, animal bones and landscapes. Her paintings present crisply contoured forms that are replete with subtle tonal transitions of varying colors. She often transformed her subject matter into powerful abstract images.

From the 1930s she spent her winters in New Mexico, relocating there after her husband’s death. In 1946 she began to explore the desert landscape as a new subject matter and in the 1950s, after beginning to travel widely, the earth sky and clouds viewed from a plane became a theme. She reduced her artwork production in 1971 given she was partially blind, but explored ceramics as a new outlet for her creativity. She, along with Charles Sheeler and Charles Demuth were the proponents of American modernism called precisionism or Cubist Realism. They straddled the borderline between representation and abstraction, often using clear-edged rectangles to illustrate skyscrapers and factories.

BIRTHDATE: Nov. 15, 1887

BIRTHPLACE: Sun Prairie, Wisconsin.

EDUCATION: Graduated from the Chatham Protestant Episcopal Institute in Williamsburg, Va. in 1904. Studied art at the Art Institute of Chicago and the Art Students League in New York.

FAMILY BACKGROUND: Ancestors were from Ireland and Hungary; her family were farmers. She grew up in both Sun Prairie and Williamsburg, Virginia.

The artistic brilliance of Georgia O’Keeffe revolutionized modern art in both her time and in the present. With her paintings she vividly portrayed the power and emotion of objects of nature. This was first seen in her charcoal drawings of silhouetted bud-like forms exhibited in 1916 that brought her fame. During the 1920s , she explored this theme in her magnified paintings of flowers which to this day enchant people amorously, although her purpose was to convey that nature in all its beauty was as powerful as the widespread industrialization of the period.

After spending a summer in New Mexico, Georgia O’Keeffe, enthralled by the barren landscape and expansive skies of the desert, would explore the subject of animal bones in her paintings of the 1930s and 1940s. Just as with the flowers, she painted the bones magnified and captured the stillness and remoteness of them, while at the same time expressing a sense of beauty that lies within the desert.

Georgia O’Keeffe was married to the pioneer photographer Alfred Stieglitz (1864-1946) in 1924. It was at Stieglitz’s famed New York art gallery „291” that her charcoal drawings were first exhibited in 1916. The union lasted 22 years, until Stieglitz’s death.

The paintings from the latter phase of Georgia O’Keeffe’s career (after her move to New Mexico in 1949) concerned a rectangular door on an adobe wall and the sky. These were far less inspiring than her earlier works-which continued to be rediscovered through her lifetime and to the present day.

DATE OF DEATH: March 6, 1986, age 98.

PLACE OF DEATH: Santa Fe, New Mexico.

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Elected to the American Academy of Arts and Letters

First retrospective show of a woman’s art at the Museum of Modern Art

Awarded the Gold Medal of Painting by the National Institute of Arts and Letters

Awarded the Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian honor

President Ronald Reagan presented the National Medal of Arts in 1985.

WEBSITES

The Georgia O’Keeffe Museum

Georgia O’Keeffe Gallery

Georgia O’Keeffe – Ellen’s place illustrated biography

Georgia O’Keeffe Art Links – links to works viewable on the Web

Georgia O’Keeffe and the Camera

June 12, 2008 – September 7, 2008

This exhibition of 60 photographs of Georgia O’Keeffe and 18 works by the artist will address the relationship between her art and photographs made of her over the course of a long career. For the first time, the exhibition will pair paintings and photographs to establish two opposing public images of the artist. Georgia O’Keeffe and the Camera will include works by famous photographers such as Ansel Adams, Alfred Stieglitz, Eliot Porter, Todd Webb, and Arnold Newman. The exhibition will also include examples of O’Keeffe’s paintings and works on paper that mark major moments in the development of her art: the early abstract drawings, the first landscapes in New Mexico from the 1930s, and the late architectural studies of her homes at the Ghost Ranch and Abiquiu.

This exhibition is made possible by the generosity of Scott and Isabelle Black. Corporate sponsorship is provided by Bank of America, with additional support from The Bear Bookshop, Marlboro, Vermont. Media support is provided by WCSH 6 and the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram.

The exhibition “Georgia O’Keeffe and the Camera” is on view at the Portland Museum of Art in Portland, Maine. For more information about the exhibition and the Museum, please visit, http://www.portlandmuseum.org

GARANA Jazz Festival 2008


The Gărâna Jazz Festival is one of the most important events of this kind in Romania, bringing every year great names from the international and national scene (e.g: Jean-Luc Ponty, Jan Garbarek Group, Dixi Krauser, Johnny Răducanu, Aura Urziceanu, Teodora Enache, Alexandrina and many others)

1997 was the first year of the festival—in the beginning the idea seemed to be a local hobby for the founders. 2001 was a turning point for the festival when the new manager of the festival, Marius Giura, wanted to include Gărâna in the international jazz festivals run. At that time Johnny Răducanu and Teodora Enache performed for the first time.

The 2008 edition of the festival will be held during 18 – 20 July in Gărâna, Romania.

Location:

Garana, 30 km de Resita

Program:

Friday 18 JULY 2008

Event:

THE LITUANIAN JAZZ TRIO (Lituania)

MIROSLAV VITOUSI (Italy)

THE MEDITERANIAN MEETING (Italy)

Saturday 19 JULY 2008

Event:

JAROSLAW SMIETANA QUARTET (Poland)

DJABE (Hungary) feat. STEVE HACKETT

VICTOR WOOTEN GROUP (USA)

NIGHTLOOSERS (Romania)

Sunday 20 JULY 2008

Event:

DOMINIUE DIPIAZZA (France) and HOREA CRISOVAN PROJECT(Romania)

CHARLES LLOYD DUB with JASON MORAN (USA)

HARRY TRIVITIAN (Romania)

ORIENT EXPRESS (Romania)

YELOW JACKET feat MIKE STERN (USA)

http://www.garana-jazz.ro/

Harry Tavitian’s „Orient Express” in Austria


12. Juli 2008 • 19.30,• Herzogburg St. Veit/Glan (Austria)

Harry Tavitians „Orient Express”

Harry Tavitian – piano, flute, vocals, percussion, Jim El Lako – violin

Zsolt Maier – alto saxophone, Edi Neumann – tenor saxophone

Hanno Höfer – guitar, David Yengibaryan – accordion

Oktavian Barila Andreescu – bass, Mario Florescu – drums, percussion

Harry Tavitian is …”the most interesting contemporary Romanian jazzman”. (International Herald Tribune – Oct 19, 1990). Born in Constanta, Romania in 1952, from Armenian parents, Tavitian started classical piano at the age of 6. He graduated The Academy of Music in Bucharest. In 1970 he saw bluesman Memphis Slim live in Brasov, Romania. This was a major influence in his future career. After this event, he started singing and playing the blues and soon he made his first steps in jazz. In 1976 he gave up classical music completely for jazz.

The music of Harry Tavitian is characterized by an openness towards multiple influences and a great capacity of synthesis as well. Tavitian himself says: …”We are here in Levant and we are part of the world. We are open to world culture and open to spontaneity”… (from the interview “HARRY TAVITIAN – A CRY FROM THE BALKANS’, by Bruce Granath / JAZZ FORUM 102, nr. 5 – 1986).

The Romanian pianist has a style of his own, well defined in East European new jazz, through his incessant artistic experiences. His sound is a melting pot of Thelonious Monk, Mal Waldron, Cecil Taylor, Dollar Brand, folklore of the Balkans, contemporary chamber music, blues, old music. Also, his Armenian roots are obvious. His music has a strong ethnic character. The Romanian spiritual area, where he has developed is a synthesis between the cultural traditions of Orient and Occident. In this area archaic convictions are still preserved and Tavitian’s music is full of myth.

After 1999 Tavitian created Orient-Express, a nine artists group of different orientations launching on the Romanian market the ethno-jazz based, first, on the development of various folklore sources. Mainly South-East European (Turkish, Bulgarian, Romanian, etc.) but not only (Transylvanian-Central European and Armenian sources weren’t neglected by this new Brailoiu-Bartok willing to emphasise on the archaic harmonic richness). Much liveliness and colour, exoticism, the show is part of the performance’s direction (including the scenic movement, including picturesque costume design) and pleases to a public willing to receive this genre… … It is useless to say we liked the performance of Tavitian, we enjoyed seeing and admiring him once-more-and-who-knows-the-number-of-times. Orient Express is a milestone of the maturity of the Constanta-European jazzman, and the feverish research will bring him to the conquest of new musical teritories. Here is Harry Tavitian, the “enfant terible” of yesterday, the master of Romanian jazz of today.

Eu, la feminin (2)


Binecuvântaţi mamele şi copiii !

După cum se afirmă clişeistic, că femeia este făcută pentru dragoste, tot aşa se pretinde că principala ei „funcţie” este maternitatea. Adevărat, de mii de ani femeia a fost acaparată de îndatoriri materne: sarcini repetate, alăptări îndelungate, o permanentă grijă de copii. Vreme îndelungată scopul căsătoriei a fost cu precădere biologic: să asigure supravieţuirea speciei. Gradul ridicat de natalitate compensa pierderile datorate mortalităţii infantile, războiului, bolilor. Ca să rămână cu unul sau doi copii, femeia trebuia să aducă pe lume zece. O casă plină de copii a fost considerată mult timp „un dar al cerului”, o binecuvântare! Ca să nu mai vorbim de exagerata preţuire acordată mamelor eroine de nazişti, dar şi de comunişti. Femeia dispreţuită ca femelă, a fost glorificată ca „Mamă”, iar maternitatea şi fecunditatea au devenit datorii religioase, morale şi civice. Cu toate acestea, glorificarea maternităţii nu era lipsită de ambiguitate. Omagiind-o ca mamă (pentru a-i uşura aservirea, probabil), bărbatul o dispreţuia în acelaşi timp pe „născătoarea” sclavă a naturii.

Cel mai cunoscut model al cinismului masculin a rămas modelul Bismark care trata femeia impunându-i faimosul program al celor trei K (Kirche, Kinder, Kuche – Biserică, Copii, Bucătărie). Triplu K rasist departe de a fi de domeniul trecutului, chiar şi în mediile cultivate de azi. Cunosc destui intelectuali super-rafinaţi, partizani ai ideii de „gospodină totală” care, imediat ce s-au însurat cu femei frumoase, inteligente, apte pentru o carieră de succes, se lăudau că foarte repede vor turna nevestelor doi, trei plozi ca să le dea „ocupaţie”. De altfel, femeile însăşi, victime ale mentalităţilor şi educaţiei primite, se tem să modifice această situaţie. Eventual, se lamentează, se victimizează şi-atât. Clişee banalizate prin uzură despre Fericire, Dragoste şi Maternitate continuă să circule, demonstrând că mitul este mai trainic decât realitatea.

Familiile numeroase sunt în continuare admirate. În fapt, aceste familii aparţin unor pături sociale defavorizate, în care, copiii – mai mult sau mai puţin doriţi – cresc şi se educă cum pot. Nimeni nu se îngrijeşte de viitorul au fericirea lor, iar aceştia, în lipsa unei afecţiuni părinteşti reale şi fără o educaţie corespunzătoare aptitudinilor lor, devin inadaptaţii şi socio-psihopaţii de mâine prin excelenţă. „Nici o bucurie nu se compară cu bucuria maternităţii”, se spune în mod curent. Şi dacă este adevărat că acei copii care cresc şi se maturizează armonios aduc bucurie părinţilor, nu mai puţin adevărat este că există mulţi copii greu de crescut, care timp de 20 de ani sau mai mult, pun părinţilor probleme legate de sănătatea lor, de caracterul lor, de studii sau diverse altele, probleme dificile de suportat la rezolvarea cărora societatea nu contribuie cu nimic sau aproape nimic.

Tatăl şi mama, egali în procreaţie, ar trebui să fie egali şi în grija faţă de copii. Nimic, în afara prejudecăţilor, nu împiedică un bărbat să ia parte la îngrijirile pe care le suscită un bebeluş, să-l spele, să-l hrănească sau să-l ducă la plimbare. Din fericire, există numeroşi soţi care-şi ajută nevestele în aceste îndatoriri, spre binele copilului care, încă din leagăn va vedea în tatăl şi mama lui două fiinţe egale.

Funcţia maternă rămâne însă, pe mai departe în conştiinţa oamenilor un fel de renunţare la viaţa personală, o modalitate pentru sacrificiul de sine, iar educarea fetiţelor preia aceste tipare. Fetiţa o vede pe mama ei dedicând mai mult timp copiilor decât tatăl şi învaţă de mică, prin exemplu şi prin cuvinte, că Datoria mamei este să renunţe la personalitatea ei, la aspiraţiile ei şi că Trebuie să se sacrifice pentru copii ei. Nimeni nu-i va spune că acest tip de sacrificiu poate da naştere unor reacţii de posesiune şi agresivitate în a căror disimulare, devotamentul e o simplă mască. Nimeni nu o învaţă că o mamă frustrată nu este şi nu poate fi o mamă iubitoare. Când o femeie renunţă la carieră de dragul maternităţii, ea îşi transferă frustrările asupra copilului pe care îl transformă centrul unor preocupări exagerate legate de sănătate, educaţie, relaţii sociale etc. O dragoste sufocantă, mai rea decât o temniţă din care copilul se va elibera cu dificultate sau niciodată.

Ronnie Mathews the Pianist Who Accompanied Jazz Stars, Dies


Ronnie Mathews, a jazz pianist whose recorded output as a leader was sparse but whose résumé as a sideman with stars of jazz was substantial, died on Saturday in Brooklyn. He was 72 and lived in the Prospect Heights neighborhood.

The cause was pancreatic cancer, his daughter, Salima Millott, said.

Mr. Matthews spent most of his career out of the spotlight. But he was highly valued by many noted fellow musicians for his harmonic acuity, his imagination as an improviser and his sensitivity as an accompanist.

Two of Mr. Mathews’s longest-lasting associations were with the saxophonist Johnny Griffin, from 1978 to 1982, and the drummer T. S. Monk — son of the pianist and composer Thelonious Monk, one of Mr. Mathews’s acknowledged influences — for most of the 1990s.

He was also a member of the orchestra for the Broadway musical “Black and Blue” in 1989 and contributed to the soundtrack of “Mo’ Better Blues,” Spike Lee’s film about jazz musicians, the following year.

He led his first recording session in 1963, the same year he began his first high-profile sideman job, with the drummer Max Roach’s group. Over the next two decades he worked regularly with a succession of well-known bandleaders but rarely led a band himself. And even after forming his own group in 1981, he continued to be heard most often, on record and in person, in a supporting role.

Born in Brooklyn on Dec. 2, 1935, Mr. Mathews began his career while still a student at the Manhattan School of Music in the late 1950s, accompanying the singer Gloria Lynne. During his four years with Roach he also worked frequently with the drummer Roy Haynes and the trumpeter Freddie Hubbard. Among his employers after he left Roach in 1967 were the trumpeter Dizzy Gillespie, the saxophonist Dexter Gordon and the drummer Art Blakey.

His most recent album was “Once I Love,” released in 2002 on the Sound Hills label.

Just five days before Mr. Mathews died, a benefit concert was held at the New York nightclub Sweet Rhythm to help pay his medical expenses. The lineup included some of the best-known musicians in jazz; among them were Mr. Mathews’s fellow pianists Ray Bryant, Cedar Walton and Randy Weston.

Mr. Mathews’s marriage to Jean Marie McGeary ended in divorce. In addition to his daughter, of Manhattan, he is survived by a stepdaughter, Leslie Conte of Brooklyn; a stepson, Brently Conte of Winston-Salem, N.C.; and two granddaughters.

The New York Times

Published: July 2, 2008